Live Blood Credibility for Darkfield Microscopy

Let me be the first to tell you that Live Blood Analysis using Darkfield Microscopy is highly disputed. It is based on the observations and interpretations of the practitioner and has limited scientific acceptance, especially within the allopathic arena. This dispute has existed for over 50 years and is unlikely to change.

The observations during a Live Blood session are in no way intended to diagnose or replace the findings of a medical doctor. The information shared simply provides insight into your body in action, as it deals with your present lifestyle.

So what is the value?

Darkfield microscopy provides the visual insight that offers guidelines for nutrition, supplementation and lifestyle changes. Some experts such as Dr. James Privitera, author of “Silent Clots – Life’s Biggest Killers”, Dr. Guenther Enderlein, and Thomas Riddick, a chemist and advocate for the Zeta Potential, would agree that changing the milieu within the blood is first and foremost for promoting balance within.

Based on years of observing blood and affecting change using targeted nutrition and supplementation, I am more than convinced of the value of Dark Field Microscopy to identify pleomorphisms. The information gathered after observing blood serves as a valuable and powerful initiator of change.

As Live and Dry Blood Cell Analysis are closely aligned with Biological Medicine, your constitution is a strong consideration when determining the point of entry and milieu treatment. This modality is both predictive and preventative.  It is a foundational piece of the puzzle, and a valuable one.